Dear X and Y,
I'm writing in a state of some frustration and disappointment to withdraw my essay from Top Journal in My Field of American Literature. I submitted the piece on the 2nd of August, 2012, now 1 year and 4 months ago. I have not received any reader reports on the article.
I appreciate that you are reliant on academics to review for you and that delays occur in the process. However, I have waited through multiple assurances, especially as you noted that you were "very excited" about having the piece reviewed in September 2012 [after a consultation with the editorial board as to whether the scope could be expanded to accommodate the piece], to no avail.
After this delay, even if you were to have the piece reviewed now, it will receive reports indicating that substantial portions of the literature are not cited; this is because they have been published in the substantial interim between submission and review.
I'm very sorry to do this; it is not what I wanted by any means, but I don't feel happy to wait any longer.
Best wishes,
Martin
eve.gd : Martin Paul Eve
Dear "top journal": 1 year and 4 months to review is too long
Lecturer in English
University of Lincoln
20 December 2013
Cite as: Martin Paul Eve, "Dear "top journal": 1 year and 4 months to review is too long", eve.gd: Martin Paul Eve, December 20, 2013, https://doi.org/10.59348/n5n85-1gq42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59348/n5n85-1gq42
Available at: https://eve.gd/2013/12/20/dear-top-journal-1-year-and-4-months-to-review-is-too-long/
Dear "top journal": 1 year and 4 months to review is too long
Cite as: Martin Paul Eve, "Dear "top journal": 1 year and 4 months to review is too long", eve.gd: Martin Paul Eve, , https://doi.org/10.59348/n5n85-1gq42.
Download this post as a PDF | View this item on KC Works | View this item on BIROn | View this item on Rogue Scholar | View this item on the AT Protocol | View this item on the Fediverse | View this item on https://gem.eve.gd | View this item on gemini://gem.eve.gd
Martin Paul Eve